Case library — engagement receipts

The work, shown honestly.

Four engagements. Receipts only. Anonymized per active NDAs. Each case shows the buyer's constraint, the remediation we shipped, and the measurable outcome. All four lead with the playbook your team runs (Path58-OS) plus the agent runtime that runs it.

The work

Case library

Operating partnership · 12-month arc

+15% above ARR plan

horizontal mid-market B2B SaaS

  • Constraint

    Scaling wall on the GTM motion that worked from $20M to $40M ARR. Pipeline math no longer added up; team-onboarding cycle was killing capacity.

  • Remediation

    Tsvika held the integrated CRO seat for 12 months. Path58-OS landed as the playbook your team runs; agent runtime executed against it; quarterly cadence held the gain.

  • Outcome

    Above-plan ARR delivery. Team onboarding cut from 8 weeks to 3. The playbook operated by client team after the engagement closed.

  • Window

    12 months

  • Sponsor

    Head of Revenue / executive sponsor

Embedded build · 8-week sprint

8 tools + 4 revenue streams modeled in 2 weeks

mid-market SaaS rev-system rebuild

  • Constraint

    No coherent operating system across 8 RevOps tools. Four parallel revenue streams (new business + expansion + partner + product-led) with no shared playbook.

  • Remediation

    Path58-OS playbook landed; the operating layer (Path58 product family) instantiated 4 revenue-stream simulations; internal benchmark measurement showed which streams compounded.

  • Outcome

    Single operating system across 8 tools. Four streams modeled. Two streams identified as compounding investments; two re-scoped down. Capital allocation decision made on evidence, not intuition.

  • Window

    8 weeks

  • Sponsor

    Head of RevOps / Chief Revenue Officer

Embedded build · tiger team · 12-week arc

PLG-to-PLS launched at 12 weeks

mid-market SaaS · both pricing models compounding

  • Constraint

    Product-led growth motion plateaued; needed product-led-sales motion overlay without breaking the inbound funnel. Two parallel pricing models required.

  • Remediation

    Tiger team of 4 (2 PMM, 1 RevOps Lead, 1 GTM Engineering Manager). Path58-OS landed as the shared playbook; pricing-model simulations ran in the agent runtime; honest measurement framework confirmed both models held.

  • Outcome

    PLS motion launched at 12 weeks. Both pricing models compounding by end-of-quarter. Cadence held by client team post-engagement.

  • Window

    12 weeks

  • Sponsor

    Head of Product Marketing / Head of Revenue

Operating partnership · Series A raise · 3-month arc

Series A closed + campaign cycle cut 70%

3 months · motion locked

  • Constraint

    Series A raise depended on demonstrating a repeatable revenue system. Campaign-cycle was 8 weeks; the round timing demanded sub-3-week cycle to prove the motion.

  • Remediation

    Path58-OS playbook landed in week 2. Agent runtime instantiated against the playbook by week 6. Internal benchmark measurement validated cycle compression in real time.

  • Outcome

    Series A closed at target. Campaign cycle cut 70% (8 weeks to 2.5 weeks). Revenue motion locked and demonstrable to the board.

  • Window

    3 months

  • Sponsor

    CEO / founder

Why we anonymize — and what we still disclose.

Active NDAs mean we do not name clients or disclose exact figures without explicit operator clearance. What we do disclose: industry, ARR-bracket, the constraint shape, the remediation shape, and the directional outcome. Honest measurement is the discipline at work — including in how we present receipts.

Want to see your shape on this list?

A Constraint diagnostic is the entry. We map your rev-system constraint, deliver the brief, and tell you in writing whether we are the right firm to fix it.

Path58 ships content authored primarily with AI assistance. Per-asset attribution rides in standard metadata. Full disclosure.